From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 22 12:36:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AAB16A4CE for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:36:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mps2.plala.or.jp (c145240.vh.plala.or.jp [210.150.145.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79C743D5D for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:36:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from i220-109-121-77.s02.a026.ap.plala.or.jp ([220.109.121.77]) by mps2.plala.or.jp with ESMTP <20041122123654.UVNU20536.mps2.plala.or.jp@i220-109-121-77.s02.a026.ap.plala.or.jp>; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:36:54 +0900 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:36:41 +0900 Message-ID: <864qjixdpi.wl%sf@FreeBSD.org> From: FUJISHIMA Satsuki To: David Gilbert In-Reply-To: <16798.12075.465147.307112@canoe.dclg.ca> References: <16798.12075.465147.307112@canoe.dclg.ca> Mail-Followup-To: David Gilbert , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.32 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/20.7 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.1 (AOI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: List of fake vs. real SATA drives. X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:36:57 -0000 Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are: Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8 Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch) Any other drives (as far as I know, of course) are ATA drive with serial-parallel bridge. At Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:36:43 -0500, David Gilbert wrote: > Is there anyone compiling a list of "fake" vs. "real" SATA drives? > The difference being "fake" drives with ATA-100 electronics and an > SATA to ATA conversion chip vs. drives that really support SATA > natively?