From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 10 17:18:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653CE50B for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from cricket.hamla.org (cricket.hamla.org [206.251.255.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B057CD for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jubz (cpe-68-174-134-215.nyc.res.rr.com [68.174.134.215]) by cricket.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27B6D8A064 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:13:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:13:00 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/175723: mail/postfix: postfix+dovecot+ldap_sasl marked BROKEN Message-ID: <20130310171257.GA3874@jubz> References: <201303100221.r2A2L7b6011031@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201303100221.r2A2L7b6011031@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at cricket.hamla.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:18:13 -0000 I could modify the Makefile logic to check whether SASL header files are present, and only then include them. But, is there a particular reason you do not wish to just compile Postfix WITH_SASL2 in addition to WITH_DOVECOT or WITH_DOVECOT2? -- Sahil Tandon