Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 13:16:33 -0800 From: Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> Cc: Jim Conner <jconner@enterit.com>, dave <dmehler22@earthlink.net>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: commandline dos emulator. Message-ID: <38DD2CB1.AC62D918@gorean.org> References: <001601bf961e$8e5ce0a0$0400a8c0@davemehler.tzo.com> <4.3.1.2.20000325011856.00acd8f0@pseudonet.org> <20000325113601.A12690@dan.emsphone.com> <38DD2841.70A9F2AE@gorean.org> <20000325150823.A43959@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Nelson wrote:
>
> In the last episode (Mar 25), Doug Barton said:
> > Dan Nelson wrote:
> > > In the last episode (Mar 25), Jim Conner said:
> > > > At 12:51 AM 3/25/00 -0500, dave wrote:
> > > > > Does anyone know of a commandline dos emulator for freebsd,
> > > > >i.e. does not require x? Or how to get doscmd to work?
> > > >
> > > > Try dosemu...I've never used it before though but I hear its the
> > > > one to use...
> > >
> > > Dosemu requires X, too, unfortunately.
> >
> > No it doesn't. If X is on your system it compiles in support
> > for it. If not, it doesn't.
>
> Without X it's almost completely unusable; edit.com doesn't even load.
Well I've never gotten it to work for me anyways... but I'm told that
the latest -current has it much better. Apparently they've sorted out
the X dependencies to a greater degree.
Doug
--
"So, the cows were part of a dream that dreamed itself into
existence? Is that possible?" asked the student incredulously.
The master simply replied, "Mu."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38DD2CB1.AC62D918>