Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:56:38 +0100 From: David Chisnall <David.Chisnall@cl.cam.ac.uk> To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@me.com> Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, Sergei Vyshenski <svysh.fbsd@gmail.com>, current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 Message-ID: <B191E15F-BA02-4B27-B7F9-BC7C9A5B3E44@cl.cam.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <EA8C9D00-9DAD-4CFE-AB20-E15B96EAD65A@me.com> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <1427829555.3892.7.camel@hardenedbsd.org> <20150331192315.GH30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <CAHU0Y-6amENpYYZiQPy8Ueh-L1nB4iCz6XkzVtAkQTCiXoTVzg@mail.gmail.com> <EA8C9D00-9DAD-4CFE-AB20-E15B96EAD65A@me.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1 Apr 2015, at 05:03, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@me.com> wrote: >=20 > That is expected. WITH_PKG=3Ddevel is a make(1) option that only = affects ports (non-binary pkgs). Are you sure? I have it in make.conf on one of my systems where I never = build ports manually (and don't even have a ports tree installed) and = there I get this: $ pkg -v 1.4.99.13 In a jail on the same machine without the make.conf entry, I get the = stable version. This is how I've been testing pkg-devel for a while. = Is there a different recommended way? David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B191E15F-BA02-4B27-B7F9-BC7C9A5B3E44>