Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:26:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: docs/40423: Keyboard(4)'s definition of parameters to GETFKEY/SETFKEY off by one. Message-ID: <20020710162633.1F9B998D1@toad.stack.nl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 40423 >Category: docs >Synopsis: Keyboard(4)'s definition of parameters to GETFKEY/SETFKEY off by one. >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-doc >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Jul 10 09:30:02 PDT 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Marco van de Voort >Release: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE i386 >Organization: MCGV Stack >Environment: System: FreeBSD toad.stack.nl 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #0: Sun Jun 23 17:18:50 CEST 2002 marcolz@toad.stack.nl:/toad.mnt/sources/4.x/sys/compile/toad_vwww i386 (Man page, system unimportant) >Description: The C IOCTL (SET/GETFKEY) interface to set "function keys" requires parameters in the range 0..63 (actually 0..95) Kbdcontrol -f remaps them to 1..64 (1..96) Keyboard(4) which describes (amongst others) the SET/GETFKEY functions specifies the range as 1..64, while not mentioning that kbdcontrol add/subtracts 1 internally when necessary >How-To-Repeat: man 4 keyboard >Fix: Mention that there is a difference between the C level interface and the kbdcontrol parameter with respect to the range of the function keys. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020710162633.1F9B998D1>