From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 19:01:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1091B16A4CE; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:01:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [128.30.28.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA6443D53; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:01:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i9LJ1vqw028422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:01:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i9LJ1u28028419; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:01:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:01:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200410211901.i9LJ1u28028419@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20041021185137.GA37500@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <4177C8AD.6060706@freebsd.org> <20041021185137.GA37500@dragon.nuxi.com> X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 Subject: Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:01:59 -0000 < said: > I'm not so happy with a FreeBSD-only "proprietary" thing. Is there any > proposed RFC work that provides the qualities you want? The advantage > with T/TCP is that there was a published standard. T/TCP was a published *non*standard, loudly blazoned "EXPERIMENTAL". I don't see how Andre's proposed replacement can be any worse. -GAWollman