From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 19:22:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43EC16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:22:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outmx021.isp.belgacom.be (outmx021.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D785743D2F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:22:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brvdboss@spymac.com) Received: from outmx021.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id j34JLwAn021406 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:21:58 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from [10.0.0.42] (172.49-201-80.adsl.skynet.be [80.201.49.172]) with ESMTP id j34JLuuX021391 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:21:56 +0200 (envelope-from ) Message-ID: <425193E6.8020302@spymac.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:22:14 +0200 From: Bruno Van Den Bossche Organization: Me, Myself & I User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050328) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <424490CD.9080203@chuckr.org> <4246D3C5.5060303@ebs.gr> <4246FE33.2090608@webct.com> <4248801D.7070405@webct.com> <42489BD2.40504@varju.ca> <424BA422.8070803@varju.ca> <424C5C2A.9080407@spymac.com> <424CBA64.4040404@varju.ca> <424DD0FA.1070003@spymac.com> <424F34F4.4030709@varju.ca> <425003E5.9020905@spymac.com> <4250803F.5030805@varju.ca> In-Reply-To: <4250803F.5030805@varju.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: eclipse X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: brvdboss@spymac.com List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:22:03 -0000 Alex Varju wrote: > Bruno Van Den Bossche wrote: > [...] >> solves this problem and everything builds just fine on my machine >> without the need of a linux-jvm. > > This is perfect. I think this was the last thing I needed to clean the > port up for non-amd64 machines. I'm just doing some build testing right > now, and assuming all goes well I will be submitting the port within the > next few days. Great, the only think that still needed tweaking (I think) was the adding of a pkg_plist. >> This is an Eclipse-issue though. You seem to be more familiar with >> the Eclipse project, could you submit this to them? > > I'm actually only barely familiar with the project. :) You can probably > just submit your patch for that file to their bugzilla database. Ok, I did earlier today and there seems to a strange thing going on https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=90155 The getId() method actually returns a String and not a long as the compiler seems to think. I haven't got a clue why the compiler thinks it's a long. If you (or anyone for that matter) have any clue, feel free to pitch in :) Bruno