Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 21:51:07 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Retiring static libpam support Message-ID: <86ll5ksk44.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <42A73773.1040508@elischer.org> (Julian Elischer's message of "Wed, 08 Jun 2005 11:22:43 -0700") References: <864qc9mgqc.fsf@xps.des.no> <42A73773.1040508@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> writes: > I gues it would be ok if the basic binary is static and the PAM > modules are loaded using dlopen. You can't load dynamic objects from a static binary. It doesn't have a working dlopen() (since dlopen() is implemented by the run-time loader), and even if it did, there is no relocation table there to resolve dependencies in the dynamic object. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ll5ksk44.fsf>