From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 23 07:56:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B883916A4CE for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2D643D45 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:56:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fj@panix.com) Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EE898B6B; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:56:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from fj@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i3NEuNE19138; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:56:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:56:23 -0400 From: Joe Altman To: Lucas Holt , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040423145623.GB18472@panix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Altman , Lucas Holt , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200404221644.i3MGiYUk081922@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> <20040423080316.GC58118@freebsd.jolok.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040423080316.GC58118@freebsd.jolok.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: newbie question: Gnome 2.6 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:56:43 -0000 On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:03:16AM -0700, Joshua Lokken wrote: > * Lucas Holt [2004-04-22 11:32]: > > > > The problem only seems to be with X11. I tried running several commands in > > console mode that I can normally run from any location and they all worked > > fine. so far startx seems to be the only thing that won't run like it used > > This could be for naught, but what does 'xinit' do for you? > > > to. I read something about shells having to be rehashed to update the PATH > > lines? I run in bash if that makes a difference. > > > > If I'm not mistaken, you only need to run rehash with a csh not sh/bash. > > Besides, you said the machine rebooted. The path should be correct then. > > Right and right. Rehash is a [t]csh builtin, not present in Bourne > shells, and yep, if the machine was rebooted (or the user logged out), > then the point is moot. hash is in bash. There's a slogan in there, somewhere...