Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:50:26 -0800
From:      Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
To:        vd@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/mpatrol Makefile ports/devel/mpatrol/files patch-..::..::src::mptrace.c
Message-ID:  <454AE6B2.70702@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061103064819.GA64957@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
References:  <200611030351.kA33peWQ061783@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061103061317.GB64699@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454ADF4A.5080201@FreeBSD.org> <20061103064819.GA64957@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vasil Dimov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 10:18:50PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>> Vasil Dimov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:51:40AM +0000, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>>>> sobomax     2006-11-03 03:51:40 UTC
>>> [...]
>>>>  Added files:
>>>>    devel/mpatrol/files  patch-..::..::src::mptrace.c 
>>> Aargh :-/
>>> I thought we were supposed to use Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl for new
>>> patches.
>> Why so? We have Tools/scripts/patchtool.py for the few years now.
> 
> The note I made was about the convention, not the exact tool used. You
> should read:
> 
> "I thought we were supposed to use the convention used by
> Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl for new patches."

Who those "we" are and why exactly they should use that "convention"? Is 
it official or what?

-Maxim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?454AE6B2.70702>