Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:58:44 -0300
From:      "Danilo G. Baio" <dbaio@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: pkg-fallout reports
Message-ID:  <20200814165844.dxbvy7ztjfilkatx@t480.local>
In-Reply-To: <2d720267-061b-c802-5670-7daa25d0353c@freebsd.org>
References:  <20200813225414.jomrx4cegbp5jqit@t480.local> <2d720267-061b-c802-5670-7daa25d0353c@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--defw7yew2tjgnklt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 01:37:19PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 14.08.20 um 00:54 schrieb Danilo G. Baio:
> > Hi.
> >=20
> > Just sharing this simple project that gathers freebsd-pkg-fallout [1]
> > reports into a database for easy filtering:
> >=20
> > https://portsfallout.com/fallout
> >=20
> >=20
> > I hope it's useful for port maintainers.
>=20
> Hi Danilo,
>=20
> very useful indeed!
>=20
> One thing I noticed: The filtering by maintainer name performs
> a sub-string match of the argument, which due to many very short
> account names leads to "false positive" matches.
>=20
> How about a different match algorithm:
>=20
> 1) If argument has no domain part then
>=20
> 1.a) attach "@freebsd.org" and check for identity (full length
>      comparison)
>=20
> 1.b) compare argument with name part of maintainer mail address
>      (sans domain part)
>=20
> 2) Compare argument with domain with implied anchor on first
>    characters
>=20
> 3) Sub-string search as currently done
>=20
> Stop whenever a step returns a non-empty result.
>=20
> This would allow committers to match by their login name and it
> should give reasonable results for external maintainers, too.
>=20
> Is it possible to suppress or mark results that correspond to
> ports that have been fixed or failed only spuriously?
> (This might e.g. be implemented if it was known when another
> round of package builds have been completed for the architecture
> and release that caused a report and the failure has not been
> reported again.)


Hi Stefan.

Thanks for the tips.

I'll improve this search form.

And about the build fix part, there is nothing yet to mark if some issue
was fixed.

--=20
Danilo G. Baio (dbaio)

--defw7yew2tjgnklt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=fF4O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--defw7yew2tjgnklt--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200814165844.dxbvy7ztjfilkatx>