Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:33:45 +0100 From: Lapo Luchini <lapo@lapo.it> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WINE in jail [Was: i386_set_ldt and wine on AMD64] Message-ID: <49427649.20006@lapo.it> In-Reply-To: <20081212130631.GC2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <32d8477c0612301410q2aaf9d39k859d242739554fd6@mail.gmail.com> <20061231003901.GA76688@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <ghtjp9$3j0$1@ger.gmane.org> <20081212130631.GC2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kostik Belousov wrote: > Hmm, so you have a wine on amd64 and willingness to test ? > Please, try > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/amd64_ldt.2.patch > patch is against HEAD. Here in the office I've got a 7.0-RELEASE-p6 (updated with freebsd-update binary updates) and I'm not willing to test a patch against -CURRENT on it, but I may consider configuring a different host at home just for the sake of testing it… is the patch simply against HEAD by accident or does really depend on changes that are not available in 7-STABLE? -- Lapo Luchini - http://lapo.it/ “Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things.” (Robert A. Heinlein, 1973)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49427649.20006>