From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 26 18:19:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56C21065672; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:19:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1EE8FC08; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so2403678wwc.31 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:19:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=P9YukOPaSxK6cB71s1EcEM7Zl8eRUiYmnw4ExGN+yHs=; b=B/l7g0A4A3egiW/m1Zjtll+6PTHKfj0eJApRMRhmc0hwugZ1hDg5tjqyUG3QDoLOhz EtuJoUyB2DBkXiLxi24m7kXNnQ1Bvw7k4EjF8xMs4ibuo1DNwFpqUuNrtrezicrUG3Qs WSQm7zvfDYIHH8GLEY+DtHAV1ghCZz/28FeQU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=J+l5WKL+9r0h7fuexJ57U43NMzI87VBdg+xDW0V5l+nZ2B6YTVnf1M5yXRfGUfwsfW vdl6HCBN3VTgCxrvI0E7XWfQKb15arBWXjQuVz3Z9ZL2nJhkkGlfIEpwK4Q3pcXl/JsW DaU0VWnpnL7p8Nfjg1iRbGN74dGwnxriX0+sw= Received: by 10.227.179.138 with SMTP id bq10mr2141677wbb.12.1301163570674; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.jennejohn.org (p578E281A.dip.t-dialin.net [87.142.40.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g7sm1077689wby.14.2011.03.26.11.19.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:19:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:19:27 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: "O. Hartmann" Message-ID: <20110326191927.1bd25c06@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <4D8E2830.70105@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4D8DAD7E.8090109@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4D8DC619.9080503@freebsd.org> <4D8DDFC4.9070003@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110326134804.GA78089@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4D8E2830.70105@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-x11 , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon , jkim@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: XIO: fatal IO error 35 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server ":0.0" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gljennjohn@googlemail.com List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:19:33 -0000 On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:53:52 +0100 "O. Hartmann" wrote: > On 03/26/11 14:48, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:44:52PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> On 26.03.2011 11:55, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >>> on 26/03/2011 11:10 O. Hartmann said the following: > >>>> Updating ports and source of my FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 host, equipted > >>>> with a > >>>> AMD/ATi HD4830 graphics board driven by X11 xf86-video-ati driver (which > >>>> has > >>>> been recently update as far as I saw), > >>>> resulted this morning in an 'un-login-able' box. > >>>> > >>>> I see the xdm-login requester, but after successfully login, I see for a > >>>> second > >>>> the desktop (windowmaker), but X11 immediately dies and resets to the xdm > >>>> requester again. > >>> > >>> Are you subscribed to our x11 list? It's quite low volume. > >>> Please see recent messages in its archive, perhaps they could help you. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Hello. > >> > >> No, I'm actually not subscribed to that list. Since the problem occured > >> since yesterday's update out of the blue, I thought it could be more > >> FreeBSD related than X11 related. But I will reply to the X11 list as > >> well. I simply forgot in my desperate pain, sorry. > >> > > See > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2011-March/010737.html > > > I downgraded the AMD/ATi driver to version xf86-video-ati-6.14.0_1, I > desperately need my boxes since I have to finish work. > Three different types of AMD/ATi graphics cards out of the same product > class are not working with the new xf86-video-ati-6.14.1 and as the > above mentioned link suggests, the solution is well known. I was > wondering how this port could be so easily slipped into the repository ... > > Since the patch Jun-uk Kim referred to is a GIT patch and it seems to > work, is there a 'simple' way without installing the GIT stuff from > ports to patch the defective port? > Have you looked at the link? The patch is trivial and can easily be applied by hand. -- Gary Jennejohn