From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 28 01:03:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820F4DA1 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 01:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pki2.com) Received: from btw.pki2.com (btw.pki2.com [IPv6:2001:470:a:6fd::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A72C1159 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 01:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by btw.pki2.com (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3S12sLT006413; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:02:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@pki2.com) Subject: Re: SMP boot differences between 8.4 and 9.1? From: Dennis Glatting To: Erich Dollansky In-Reply-To: <20130428072453.547c6d82@X220.ovitrap.com> References: <1367076544.10478.8.camel@btw.pki2.com> <20130428072453.547c6d82@X220.ovitrap.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:02:54 -0700 Message-ID: <1367110974.4422.0.camel@btw.pki2.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Dennis Glatting X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: r3S12sLT006413 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: freebsd@pki2.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 01:03:09 -0000 On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 07:24 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 08:29:04 -0700 > Dennis Glatting wrote: > > > > > I have two four socket Opteron 6200 motherboards with populated > > 16-core Opteron 6200 series processors. Onw is Tyan (below) and the > > other Supermicro. > > nice machines. > > > > When booted under 8.4 only two sockets are recognized but four under > > 9.1. Is this expected behavior? > > > they are recognised but disabled. Is this the generic kernel? > Yes.