Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 14 Nov 2015 15:39:11 +0100
From:      Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de>
To:        Doug McIntyre <merlyn@geeks.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: freebsd-update-server current repo location?
Message-ID:  <20151114153911.23145057@fabiankeil.de>
In-Reply-To: <20151113161609.GA31542@geeks.org>
References:  <20151110174248.GB73663@geeks.org> <CAHzLAVE4Fu++SvoELuHJ5EefRx==g60zRtJntLqDTU6KLt+9xQ@mail.gmail.com> <20151112205736.GB15217@geeks.org> <20151113103927.1c3654e8@fabiankeil.de> <20151113161609.GA31542@geeks.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
--Sig_/XclO0V1PYmGeo=JNK/IGlru
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Doug McIntyre <merlyn@geeks.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:39:27AM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Doug McIntyre <merlyn@geeks.org> wrote: =20
> > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:25:05AM -0500, Rick Miller wrote: =20
> > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Doug McIntyre <merlyn@geeks.org> =
wrote:   =20
> > > > > But I'm having problems during the big build with the machine cho=
wing
> > > > > memory to inactive memory and eventually running out of swap. ..
> > > > > So I was looking for the current repo of this code? [freebsd-upda=
te-server]   =20
> > > >...=20
> > > > A recent build consumed approximately 12GB of swap on a VM with 8 C=
PUs and
> > > > 32GB RAM.  I chocked the resource utilization up to the fact that t=
he VM
> > > > did not have enough RAM.  Building FreeBSD source, especially multi=
ple
> > > > instances of it, is likely to be much more memory intensive than th=
e VM had
> > > > in capacity.   =20
>=20
> > If you are using ZFS, you may want to take a look at the various patche=
s at:
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D187594 =20
>=20
>=20
> I had already tested that sort of thing by bringing up a UFS machine
> to test with and it had the same issues as my normal ZFS root machine bui=
ld.
> So, it doesn't seem to be filesystem related..

Interesting. The patch from comment #241 should work with UFS as well, thou=
gh.

Fabian

--Sig_/XclO0V1PYmGeo=JNK/IGlru
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlZHR48ACgkQBYqIVf93VJ1A2gCfdpAvpWEXCFPbE5IDtdVvKMmh
2CQAoJTBE9jIHeRhGrSeW0CUWLldTvCs
=AEOU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/XclO0V1PYmGeo=JNK/IGlru--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151114153911.23145057>