Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:56:43 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Stephan Uphoff <ups@tree.com> Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: scheduler (sched_4bsd) questions Message-ID: <415D9A5B.10200@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <1096647194.27811.12.camel@palm.tree.com> References: <1095468747.31297.241.camel@palm.tree.com> <1096477932.3733.1471.camel@palm.tree.com> <1096489576.3733.1868.camel@palm.tree.com> <200409291652.29990.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <1096496057.3733.2163.camel@palm.tree.com> <1096603981.21577.195.camel@palm.tree.com> <1096608201.21577.203.camel@palm.tree.com> <20041001141040.GA1556@peter.osted.lan> <1096647194.27811.12.camel@palm.tree.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephan Uphoff wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 10:10, Peter Holm wrote: > >>On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 01:23:21AM -0400, Stephan Uphoff wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 00:13, Stephan Uphoff wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I also had overlooked >>>> http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/cons80.html >>>>Showing that my patch for kern_switch.c (switch_patch) has a bug. >>>>I will send an updated patch later today. >>> >>>OK - here is the promised patch. >>> >> >>For once I'm the bearer of good news. The switch_patch_v2 + the >>sched_4bsd patch ran the tests for more than one hour without >>any freeze. The sched_4bsd alone did not stop the freezes. I'm >>now testing the switch_patch_v2 alone and it's looking good for >>55+ minutes of testing. > > > Great ! > I guess I should roll a cleaned up cumulative patch soon. > > Stephan I'm on the sidelines cheering.. I'm just coming off a hmmm.. 28 hour day from work.. ** need sleep **
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?415D9A5B.10200>