Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 15:16:35 +0200 (MET DST) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> To: wes@softweyr.com (Wes Peters) Cc: gram@cdsec.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using select() to implement a delay Message-ID: <199904201316.PAA23736@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <371C9D1D.CBBB6A8F@softweyr.com> from "Wes Peters" at Apr 20, 99 09:28:10 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I have an interesting problem. I have a routine to implement delays: ... > > I am using this both because it gives better resolution than sleep(), > > and also because it doesn't require the use of SIGALRM, which I am > > using elsewhere. > > Do you have any reasons not to use usleep(3) or nanosleep(2)? portability to other unixes... luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904201316.PAA23736>