Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 01:10:16 -0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sys_generic.c Message-ID: <80763.1106648792@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:14:57 %2B0300." <20050125101457.GA28600@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20050125101457.GA28600@nagual.pp.ru>, Andrey Chernov writes: >On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:53:33AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> That would be just as bogus as the fact that open(2) doesn't affect atime. >> > >Well, SUSv3 says that "upon successful completion, where nbyte is >greater than 0, read() shall mark for update the st_atime", so I tend to >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >agree about atime here. Show me code which breaks please. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?80763.1106648792>