Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:04:47 +0000
From:      Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR issue on Intel D923XCV Motherboard.
Message-ID:  <1109606688.71363.7.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200502251348.56332.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <421DACC1.1070307@toya.net.pl> <200502241230.35536.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <421F0B5C.9090507@toya.net.pl> <200502251348.56332.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 13:48 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 25 February 2005 06:26 am, Mateusz J=EAdrasik wrote:
> > > Your network device just isn't supported yet:
> >
> > Okay sorry about the email before, i stand corrected ;) I tried stable
> > from 20050224, the last 5.3 /next is 5.4-PRERELEASE/ and i recieve the
> > same errors, with _ADR acpi, and also the device seems not supported.
> >
> > > pcib3: <ACPI PCI-PCI bridge> at device 28.1 on pci0
> > > pci4: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib3
> > > pci4: <network, ethernet> at device 0.0 (no driver attached)
> > >
> > > It may be very trivial to add support for it.  Can you get the output=
 of
> > > 'pciconf -lv' for the pci4:0:0 device?  Also, do you know if this net=
work
> > > adapter is supposed to be a 10/100 adapter or a 10/100/1000 (Gigabit)=
?
> >
> > Yes, as i believe the if_sk would simply require some kind of identity
> > lift? Anywho, here follows the pciconf -vl of the machine, hope that
> > clears things up somehow. cheers.
>=20
> none4@pci4:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x30638086 chip=3D0x436111ab rev=
=3D0x17=20
> hdr=3D0x00
>     vendor   =3D 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)'
>     class    =3D network
>     subclass =3D ethernet
>=20
> so a possible patch to if_sk.c might be:

[snipped]

I had (and possibly still have) access to this motherboard, and was
working on trying to get this card working a while ago.  The PHY seems
to be different on these chips, and no amount of persuasion helped with
recognising it.

I can probably get this machine back up and running if someone wants any
information from the sk interface.

Gavin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1109606688.71363.7.camel>