From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 25 11:41:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.agitated.net (dsl254-116-014.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.116.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B3037B422 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:41:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aforgue@agitated.net) Received: from ltu333 (LTU333.LTU.EDU [198.111.37.253]) by mail.agitated.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D6C3014CCB; Fri, 25 May 2001 13:22:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <006c01c0e54a$4db08ad0$fd256fc6@ltu.edu> From: "Andrew Forgue" To: "Thomas Lau" Cc: References: <000001c0e5a6$aeff1b60$9c10123d@lau> Subject: Re: Western Digital or IBM of Hard Disk are better? Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:39:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Message Personally, I have found better performance using IBM's drives .. However I did break My IBM 13GB one time because I kicked it (oops) :(... Id go with IBM. -andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: Thomas Lau To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 1:42 AM Subject: Western Digital or IBM of Hard Disk are better? well, I hear that WD of 5400RPM HD speed near 7200RPM, is it ture? and my 34.2GB IBM HD was dead, I will not trust IBM anymore because have problem 3times ago I want to use IDE. not SCSI! please make some suggestion, and please leave out your suggested HD of model type, so it can help me to search about it, Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message