Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:45:21 -0500
From:      David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/msun/i387 fenv.c fenv.h
Message-ID:  <20050318064521.GA42508@VARK.MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <20050317.233645.74714466.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20050318055212.GA70385@FreeBSD.org> <20050318061647.GA40922@VARK.MIT.EDU> <423A7277.1000202@samsco.org> <20050317.233645.74714466.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005, Warner Losh wrote:
> > You had better bump the version number for libm before 6.0 rolls
> > around!!  I've just found a 3rd party binary-only package that
> > supports 'FreeBSD 5.x' but is linked against libm.so.2.  Ugh.  We
> > need to bury that mistake and NOT make it again.
> 
> 6.0 already has /lib/libm.so.3

So does 5.3.  I think Scott's point is that if we're going to bump
it for 6.X at all, we had better do it soon or risk running into
the same mess we had before.  I agree with that, although at
present I don't know of a compelling reason to do the bump the
libm version number at all.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050318064521.GA42508>