From owner-freebsd-net Fri Mar 23 7: 4:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from prism.flugsvamp.com (cb58709-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.17.241.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C149537B71D for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:04:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jlemon@flugsvamp.com) Received: (from jlemon@localhost) by prism.flugsvamp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f2NF0gh61993; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:00:42 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jlemon) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:00:42 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Lemon Message-Id: <200103231500.f2NF0gh61993@prism.flugsvamp.com> To: bsddiy@21cn.com, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance X-Newsgroups: local.mail.freebsd-net In-Reply-To: <01295542.20010323085541@21cn.com> References: Organization: Cc: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article <01295542.20010323085541@21cn.com> you write: >I can confirm Linux 2.4 TCP/IP is faster than FreeBSD, they have >dynamic tuned TCP window, unlike we have a fixed max TCP window >set in SYSCTL. they have SACK and FACK, it is better in high speed line >than FreeBSD, it is also multi-threaded, better on SMP, someone >despise Linux should wakeup now, Linux is not so bad. Unfortunately, you haven't confirmed anything here, other than Linux has a different feature set than FreeBSD, which we already are aware of. Just having more features does not automatically make things faster. -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message