Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:29:04 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Questions on the scheduler Message-ID: <46FE8B60.1010004@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20070929171908.GA1984@olymp.home> References: <80f4f2b20709240723m121aad88ofaf728f384dd6c20@mail.gmail.com> <20070924184415.7bffd7d2@gumby.homeunix.com.> <46FE790A.1000101@FreeBSD.org> <20070929163116.GA1748@olymp.home> <46FE8120.4040608@FreeBSD.org> <499c70c0709291008y3d42adc4u68fa0f717088f94e@mail.gmail.com> <20070929171908.GA1984@olymp.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oliver Herold wrote: > OpenBSD isn't about performance, so it will be most of the time inferior. > > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2007/09/28/0014.html > > Maybe this is of some help. But if compare it to Jeffs FreeBSD/Linux benches it > looks rather strange to me. Yeah, that's the one I am talking about. He didn't provide any details of configuration, settings or tuning so it is not yet possible to understand what the graphs mean, if anything. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46FE8B60.1010004>