Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 May 2006 18:05:43 -0700
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Thomas Vogt <freebsdlists@bsdunix.ch>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Marcin Jessa <lists@yazzy.org>
Subject:   Re: trunk interface (was (no subject))
Message-ID:  <446D19E7.2010804@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <FCF0E8B5-C60F-4B87-810A-289C2D948B83@bsdunix.ch>
References:  <C378B27F-22B6-4905-9BE8-54BF47A400A7@bsdunix.ch>	<20060518220945.f81a743a.lists@yazzy.org> <FCF0E8B5-C60F-4B87-810A-289C2D948B83@bsdunix.ch>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Vogt wrote:

> Hi
>
> Thanks. I know about the netgraph ether/fec interfaces. But I thought  
> about a solution without netgraph. AFAIK Netgraph implies overhead  
> and ng_ehter is more complicated to set up. This is a problem with  
> non technical people. I'm happy they already know a bit about   
> ifconfig commands.


two items.
1/ ng_fec only uses the config framework of netgraph. For data it goes 
direct to the interfaces.
2/ netgraph is not that high an overhead.  (what made you think it was?)

>
> I will try it anyway.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
> Am 19.05.2006 um 00:09 schrieb Marcin Jessa:
>
>> On Thu, 18 May 2006 23:52:40 +0200
>> Thomas Vogt <freebsdlists@bsdunix.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Does FreeBSD offers anything similar like trunk(4) on OpenBSD (link
>>> aggregation and link failover interface)?
>>
>>
>> Is your browser broken?
>> http://www.google.no/search?hl=no&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=freebsd+interface 
>> +bonding&btnG=S%F8k&meta=
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?446D19E7.2010804>