Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Oct 2020 21:32:11 +0200
From:      Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To:        David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What is the "better / best " method to multi-boot different OSes natively WITHOUT VirtualBox(es) ?
Message-ID:  <20201024213211.065fdb26.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <8bfbda9f-79b9-5e45-7c00-de32da3f14ed@holgerdanske.com>
References:  <CALMiprbGBaSJQUAA=1HDZAjvsVNK7dqB_5mBb5DKzV16F3hxHg@mail.gmail.com> <20201024111010.5c867e8540a369b826d26703@sohara.org> <8bfbda9f-79b9-5e45-7c00-de32da3f14ed@holgerdanske.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:40:10 -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> On 2020-10-24 03:10, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:51:25 -0700
> > TheBigBlue Guard <thebigblueguard@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Yes ...everyone...What is the "better /best and least expensive "
> > 
> > 	A [boot] swap drive bay is the most foolproof and reliable method that
> > ensures no OS no matter how buggy or misguided can mess up another.
> 
> 
> Boot drive swap bay -- minimum effort, maximum reliability, and maximum 
> expense.  This is what I do.
> 
> 
> Multi-boot -- maximum effort, minimum reliability, and minimum expense.

Add safety to the list - a disk that is not in the machine
cannot be messed up by a stupid installer program. :-)


-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20201024213211.065fdb26.freebsd>