From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 18:19:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5873616A41F for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 18:19:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FB8B43D45 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 18:19:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 4433 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2005 18:19:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 9 Aug 2005 18:19:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 15306 invoked by uid 89); 9 Aug 2005 18:19:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2005 18:19:27 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869A2116B0; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:19:25 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:19:25 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Message-ID: <20050809211925.1bff720d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20050809211830.6335989f@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <42F4F968.80600@squbes.com> <20050809033920.GA87042@xor.obsecurity.org> <42F8B328.4030305@squbes.com> <20050809134728.GA55529@xor.obsecurity.org> <42F8B8D6.4040304@squbes.com> <20050809154342.GB88538@xor.obsecurity.org> <42F8E398.9030003@squbes.com> <20050809172754.GA21952@xor.obsecurity.org> <42F8EA5E.80906@squbes.com> <20050809205522.3001aaad@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20050809175846.GA22660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050809211830.6335989f@it.buh.tecnik93.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gregg Cooper , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Ports disconnected from category Makefiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 18:19:31 -0000 On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:18:30 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:58:46 -0400 > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:55:22PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:39:42 -0400 > > > Gregg Cooper wrote: > > > > > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > >>... what is a "more better" way to snatch as many ports as > > > > >>possible? > > > > > > > > > > Use make -k > > > > > > > > Excellent ... I was churning over in ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk > > > > thinking it would hold the key and never even thought to go look > > > > at make ... thanks! > > > > > > And if you really want to grab everything possible use: > > > make -k -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES -DTRY_BROKEN > > > > > > It also might make sense to run a few parallel fetch jobs; > > > especially on a slower/busy machine there's pretty much time spent > > > "non-fetching". > > > > I was going to suggest this but you'll run the risk of collisions > > between some of the ports that download the same distfiles, which > > may lead to corruption. > > True; after the fetch is finished run a make checksum (this is a good > idea for non-parallel fetch also). With the same arguments, of course make -k -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES -DTRY_BROKEN checksum -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"