Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 19:54:18 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Seth Leigh <seth@pengar.com> Cc: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: possible problem with SMP? Message-ID: <20010214195418.A79489@mollari.cthul.hu> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010214222040.00aac5c0@hobbiton.shire.net>; from seth@pengar.com on Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 10:34:57PM -0500 References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010214142231.6504A-100000@p1> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010214142231.6504A-100000@p1> <20010214191110.D78224@mollari.cthul.hu> <5.0.2.1.0.20010214222040.00aac5c0@hobbiton.shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 10:34:57PM -0500, Seth Leigh wrote: > To be honest, if FreeBSD can just get a threads library that uses a One t= o=20 > One ratio of threads to lwps (I am quite ignorant as to whether FreeBSD h= as=20 > the equivelant of the LWP structure, so just substitute process or whatev= er=20 > if I am off) I would be quite happy, and I am sure that performance would= =20 > be just fine. See the LinuxThreads port already mentioned. > I would be very much interested to see just how FreeBSD intends to Do=20 > Threading Right. See the webpage already mentioned. Kris --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6i1LqWry0BWjoQKURApbrAJ9eo7J84x2ZTOOQyqm6mb0R1aSo3ACfdBd1 0m/HCwWC9jEd7xLqhnlxneQ= =7ukB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010214195418.A79489>