Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:14:07 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192642] update mail/mailagent to a non-interactive, regular port Message-ID: <bug-192642-13-7HYacwqwRI@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-192642-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-192642-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192642 --- Comment #16 from Yoshiaki Kasahara <ykasap@gmail.com> --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #15) > I'm wondering if that's a good idea. There's a big push to reduce the > number of files in ports, which is why you often see pkg-plist embedded in > Makefile to save a single inode (which costs 4kb). If pkg-plist can handle > a conditional delete and it saves a file, we should probably leave that how > it was. Well, then I think merging multiple patch files into one is more beneficial. Is there any guideline to merge files/patch-* ? BTW, I realized that I could merge pkg-{install,deinstall} into pkg-plist using PLIST_SUB and @exec/@unexec. I'll post new patch soon (after testport). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-192642-13-7HYacwqwRI>