Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:42:01 +0300
From:      Greg V <greg@unrelenting.technology>
To:        "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
Cc:        Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bluestop.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD EFI projects
Message-ID:  <1537368121.5568.1@hraggstad.unrelenting.technology>
In-Reply-To: <201809191434.w8JEY41Z024163@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
References:  <76404aad-40f3-e3ad-35b1-949fb5afb086@bluestop.org> <201809191434.w8JEY41Z024163@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Rodney W. Grimes 
<freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
>>  On 9/18/18 4:11 AM, Greg V wrote:
>> 
>>  >
>>  > I can confirm that the kernel already worked fine when booted from
>>  > 32-bit EFI.
>>  >
>>  > I booted an old Mac into HardenedBSD using a 32-bit-EFI build of 
>> GRUB2 :)
>> 
>> 
>>  Was that a 64-bit version of FreeBSD? My understanding is the 32-bit
>>  FreeBSD boots fine, but 64-bit needs work.
> 
> You would be hard pressed to find a system with a 64 bit CPU that
> could run 64 bit FreeBSD that had a 32 bit EFI implementation.

Mac mini 2006 with a Core2Duo instead of the stock CoreDuo (and the 
2007 model's firmware flashed, but I don't think that impacts FreeBSD).

And probably just the 2007 model as well :)

Also, IIRC there were some Intel Atom tablets with 32-bit EFI.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1537368121.5568.1>