Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:13:40 -0400 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu Cc: idfubar@yahoo.com Subject: Re: out of i-nodes? Message-ID: <20041010181340.1f26e12c.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20041010215036.99359.qmail@web52106.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20041010164435.3ccdd0e0.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20041010215036.99359.qmail@web52106.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rishi Chopra <idfubar@yahoo.com> wrote: > -- Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> wrote: > > > > > Don't wrap machine generated output, it makes your > > email a PITA to decipher. > > As long as we're on the subject of ettiquette, don't > include your replies on top of messages like a > dumbshmuck n00b. > > Question still stands; I apologize for text wrapping > of some email clients. You didn't read the entire email, and you snipped away the answer when you replied. I put the formatting note at the top of the message, because it wasn't really related to the message content itself. This could be argued in circles as to whether it's good or bad formatting practice, but I don't care to argue it today. If enough people jump down my throat who believe it's bad practice, I'll change it, but you're the first that's complained in many years. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041010181340.1f26e12c.wmoran>