From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 9 01:53:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA12303 for current-outgoing; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 01:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA12293 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 01:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA13075; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 01:49:24 -0700 (PDT) To: Andrzej Bialecki cc: Andreas Klemm , Ollivier Robert , "FreeBSD Current Users' list" Subject: Re: Worldstone for K6/208 In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Jun 1997 09:50:35 +0200." Date: Mon, 09 Jun 1997 01:49:24 -0700 Message-ID: <13049.865846164@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > You know, guys, this whole Worldstone thing sounds to me pretty useless. > The source tree changes every day, so in fact you compare *two different* > "worlds". That's my opinion. Prove me wrong, and I'll yield :-) Back when we used to actually try and *meaningfully* compare worldstones, oh at least a year or so ago (:-), we always used the same-dated -current tree on all systems using the well-known "shouting method" of syncronization ("OK, we're all going to use March 15th, right? And anyone not using a 15th March tree is just going to shut up, right?", "[chorus] Right!", "OK then! Build 'em!"). I suggest a return to this practice. :-) Jordan