Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 24 Sep 2017 19:25:17 -0600
From:      Keith Hellman <khellman@mcprogramming.com>
To:        freebsd-ports List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/execinfo.mk and r450351
Message-ID:  <20170925012517.GE15401@dane.localdomain>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--MIdTMoZhcV1D07fI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello all,

I'm running=20

  FreeBSD dane.localdomain 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r320599

with a ports tree synced with svn and package update management with=20
portmaster(8).  I synced the tree up to 450554 today and portmaster=20
spat out the following.

 /usr/ports# portmaster -m BATCH=3Dyes -D --update-if-newer --no-confirm -a
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 1439: Cannot open /usr/ports/Mk/Uses=
/execinfo.mk
make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue

This occurs for what appears to be six of the ports I have installed.

I notice that r450351--r450354 deal with execinfo, specifically r450351
removes execinfo support.  The ports complaining for my own situation
were:

  devel/qt5-core
  x11-toolkits/wxgtk30
  devel/cmake
  sysutils/fusefs-ext4fuse
  lang/ruby23

I've remove the execinfo USES references in these ports' Makefiles and
portmaster no longer complains during the update.

I'm still cutting my teeth on freebsd's ports system, I'm unsure if I=20
should submit a PR about this (a grep command seemed to find about 163=20
instances of USES containing execinfo) or if I simply don't realize I
that I've hosed my ports tree :/

TiA for any advice,
--=20
Keith Hellman                             #include <disclaimer.h>
khellman@mcprogramming.com                from disclaimer import standard
khellman@mines.edu                        gpg key 9FCF40FD
                                          freenode.net as mrtuple

If they want really buzzword-compliant "redundancy" they could add=20
another exchange server as part of a "cluster" of "Windows 2003"
servers with "active directory" so that when things break they=20
break spectacularly.

-- Jim Ockers, P.Eng. (http://www.ockers.net/); CLUE-Tech mailing list

--MIdTMoZhcV1D07fI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAlnIWvgACgkQeAsFcZ/PQP3E8ACgjt8sSWyHE31M869G22pG1T+m
JCoAn2+J4/WzBva5HTAdTYCrG9l/aOYQ
=1Yo/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--MIdTMoZhcV1D07fI--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170925012517.GE15401>