From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov  5 16:28:58 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71FCFC7;
 Mon,  5 Nov 2012 16:28:58 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com
 [209.85.220.54])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AF18FC0C;
 Mon,  5 Nov 2012 16:28:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi1so4253511pad.13
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:28:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
 :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=dnyvGoaUj6UDeRpwLcovBeQwe3R3CYWmMCsBxOO0BSc=;
 b=AXCnsLoJ3pHGTJvXHN6NwhyfWzzyo2aUdTC5vtDicwUelnOcy1xdIIJFE/ewVoCyw/
 v7dv2tKWe3s+MI1koEFoV6K/UeNoLc52XU3cXoHzUQMF7seAkxYlPwbDqg3ptInpKE87
 4NRC54KbbbJ2PNQ0fK6H1DCD8Y0Y83lF4FFlHYEvvd4eVSLqc89RL3J7hq3F6b8H4Vi0
 /lJxp5ih98oToVGuLHsXN4YoBH7NPdvQinLGz9HiF0X+DLut9WA+enlzSIpgm1KYWL57
 u2qhL6vqat+ZzdfttCQkC2JD5p7RWGhwXeLwKknF8Mc1ZIVn1h2FV3u4N+YU0NnVmwSc
 +/cQ==
Received: by 10.68.234.201 with SMTP id ug9mr31699805pbc.63.1352132937956;
 Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.131] (mau.donbass.com. [92.242.127.250])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f2sm10869091paz.25.2012.11.05.08.28.55
 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5097E944.1000405@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:28:52 +0200
From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: buildworld fails on recent stable
References: <5097A5E0.2000502@gmail.com> <5097D27E.1050705@FreeBSD.org>
 <5097DE5E.6020405@FreeBSD.org> <5097E0BD.50909@gmail.com>
 <5097E2AF.2010000@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <5097E2AF.2010000@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:28:58 -0000

05.11.2012 18:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> I bet on clang 3.2.
>
> Thank you for checking.
>
> So how do we proceed from here?
> I could just revert the MFC-es, but the functionality could be desirable to some
> users.  Are there any alternatives?

Dunno, clang 3.2 is still pending so I guess it wouldn't be MFC'ed until 
December 16th? Being a minor issue it can make some people shrug from 
using clang for testing stable...

I think reverting the working change is not good as far as building 
world with clang is still not the true and default way.

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.