From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 10 17:19:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9167E1065674; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:19:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from psmtp.com (s200aob14.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 764AC8FC26; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:19:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from source ([63.174.175.251]) by eu1sys200aob014.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:19:41 UTC Received: from [0.0.0.0] (proxy.usdmm.com [172.17.10.21]) by bbbx3.usdmm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C88FD01B; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <48C7FCED.2030108@tomjudge.com> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:59:25 -0500 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bruce M. Simpson" References: <200809021542.m82Fg9GK087484@aurora.sol.net> <48BD71DD.10707@FreeBSD.org> <48BE84B0.3080603@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <48BE84B0.3080603@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jlin2918@yahoo.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, eugen@kuzbass.ru, Joe Greco Subject: Re: Quagga OSPF binds to wrong interface on FreeBSD 7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:19:45 -0000 Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > Bruce M. Simpson wrote: >> >> I understand that this situation has dragged on for some 18 months >> since changes went into 7.x. I'm sorry to hear about the problems >> you're having. I can't speak for Quagga as I haven't worked on it in >> many years, nor can I speak for the Quagga patch. >> > > I looked at the sockopt.c.diff patch briefly last night on my free > time. It is a quick and dirty bandaid by the looks of it which just > munges the socket options. It may "work for you", I haven't tested it > as I don't run Quagga. > > BTW: The RFC 1724 hack was never actually documented, so code which > relies on it is buggy and needs to be fixed. I published a patch for > routed here nearly 18 months ago, which is probably where Quagga > picked up the hack from. The patch works for us in production, we currently have 6 routers running the patch with ~30 interfaces each. Tom J