From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 7 10:00:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA20135 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 7 Apr 1998 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA20080 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 1998 10:00:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA00365; Tue, 7 Apr 1998 09:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199804071657.JAA00365@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: David Kelly cc: Wilko Bulte , FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD hackers list) Subject: Re: Summary: shopping for new video adapter In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Apr 1998 19:57:47 CDT." <199804070057.TAA02494@nospam.hiwaay.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 09:57:00 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Wilko Bulte writes: > Interesting summary, as I may shortly be in the market to replace > my 2MB Mach32 card. Was surprised nobody quoted > /usr/ports/benchmarks/xengine results. It may not be much of a > benchmark but its something more than seat of the pants. OK, people asked for it. 8) > I get between 750 and 1000 (peak) RPM, usually in the 800's with a 2MB > PCI Mach32, 1024x768 16bpp with exmh also open. 64MB PPro-200/512k. > > About 1100 RPM on an 800x600 16bpp P-133 Mach64 machine at work. Under 3.0 as of early March, 337MHz PII on a 75MHz bus, talking to a 4M Matrox Millenium II. XFree86 3.3.2, 1024x768x32bpp - 790rpm (constant) XFree86 3.3.2, 1280x1024x24bpp - 845rpm (constant, screen corrupt) XFree86 3.3.2, 1600x1200x16bpp - 1200rpm (constant) XFree86 3.3.2, 1600x1200x 8bpp - 2780rpm (constant) Xaccel 4.01, 1280x1024x24bpp - 970rpm (constant) Xaccel 4.01, 1600x1200x16bpp - 1480rpm (constant) Xaccel 4.01, 1600x1200x 8bpp - 6105rpm (constant, screen corrupt) Performance isn't (to me) so much an issue as the server working. Right now, neither work properly. The Xig server works better for me than the XFree server, in that it's hard to use the system when there's noise all over your windows. YMMV. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message