From owner-freebsd-chat  Wed Sep  3 17:53:18 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA20912
          for chat-outgoing; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 17:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA20904
          for <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 17:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA05720;
	Wed, 3 Sep 1997 17:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199709040029.RAA05720@rah.star-gate.com>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: The GUI debate 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 03 Sep 1997 13:54:47 PDT."
             <14125.873320087@time.cdrom.com> 
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 17:29:46 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I am painfully aware of the existing status quo , perhaps with
Java things will change.

	Amancio
>From The Desk Of "Jordan K. Hubbard" :
> > At any rate, both paradigm can peacefully co-exist: curses based
> > applications and X based applications the two need not be 
> > mutually exclusive.
> 
> It's all a moot point in any case since nobody is *writing* all
> these nifty X based applications. :-)
> 
> 					Jordan