From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May  8 14:45:45 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 72B1916A4CE; Sat,  8 May 2004 14:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4253843D39; Sat,  8 May 2004 14:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sam@errno.com)
Received: from [66.127.85.91] ([66.127.85.91])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i48LjiWR011978
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Sat, 8 May 2004 14:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sam@errno.com)
From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
Organization: Errno Consulting
To: Darren Reed <darrenr@hub.freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 14:44:36 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
References: <200405061846.i46Ik3Jc060969@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20040508152531.GA96827@hub.freebsd.org> <200405081125.43395.sam@errno.com>
In-Reply-To: <200405081125.43395.sam@errno.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200405081444.36584.sam@errno.com>
cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fastfwd.c ip_input.c ip_var.h
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 21:45:45 -0000

On Saturday 08 May 2004 11:25 am, Sam Leffler wrote:

> Technical disputes of this sort are supposed to be passed to the TRB.  I
> personally don't see the change as important enough to argue about--I
> haven't heard Andre weigh in, but I figured he'd just back it out.

I didn't finish the sentence and realize it contradicts what I said earlier.  
I meant to say "I figured he'd just back it out if that was the consensus."

	Sam