From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 10 01:05:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA15173 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 10 Nov 1997 01:05:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA15167 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 1997 01:05:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA13900; Mon, 10 Nov 1997 01:05:04 -0800 (PST) To: Wolfgang Helbig cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Newest Pentium bug (fatal) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Nov 1997 09:48:42 +0100." <199711100848.JAA06913@rvc1.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 01:05:04 -0800 Message-ID: <13897.879152704@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > In any case, this is a generic x86 problem and no longer of *specific* > > interest to FreeBSD - I'm sure that the comp.arch.x86 newsgroup will > > have more information. > > > > Thanks. > > Sorry, but there is one question left bothering me: > What is the state of FreeBSD's ALPHA port? Going nowhere fast. Jordan