Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 18:39:30 -0600 From: dannyman <dannyman@dannyland.org> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Gregory Sutter <gsutter@pobox.com>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, Adam Turoff <aturoff@isinet.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart Message-ID: <19990302183930.B15210@stumpy.dannyland.org> In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990302154008.00c93c80@localhost>; from Brett Glass on Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 03:45:13PM -0700 References: <4.1.19990302142419.00adaba0@localhost> <4.1.19990302134418.00a12530@localhost> <4.1.19990302132445.040f6d40@localhost> <Pine.HPP.3.96.990302153710.22218Z-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes <4.1.19990302134418.00a12530@localhost> <19990302132052.C18602@orcrist.mediacity.com> <4.1.19990302142419.00adaba0@localhost> <19990302135454.D18602@orcrist.mediacity.com> <4.1.19990302154008.00c93c80@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 03:45:13PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > At 01:54 PM 3/2/99 -0800, Gregory Sutter wrote: > >We've compromised on the single-floppy install in exchange for superior > >quality of installation, and therefore, superior quality overall. A second > >floppy is not that big a compromise. > > It's a HUGE compromise, and may show an unwillingness to "think outside the > box" and innovate something better. I think it's a rotten idea. Hhrmm. I see two systems: 1) A two-floppy install that works today. 2) A touvhy-feely improvement showing thinking "outside of the box" that exists only in Brett's starry eyes. Now which one am I going to tell my roommate to use when it comes time for him to install FreeBSD? ;) -danny -- dannyman - http://www.dannyland.org/~dannyman/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990302183930.B15210>