From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 14:51:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC4D1065676 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us) Received: from blade.simplesystems.org (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C038FC1B for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:51:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freddy.simplesystems.org (freddy.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.65]) by blade.simplesystems.org (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p23EpKD5007524; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:51:21 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:51:20 -0600 (CST) From: Bob Friesenhahn X-X-Sender: bfriesen@freddy.simplesystems.org To: Fabian Keil In-Reply-To: <20110303130130.29a066a1@r500.local> Message-ID: References: <20110227202957.GD1992@garage.freebsd.pl> <20110228192129.119cac0c@r500.local> <20110228214847.0000078c@unknown> <20110303130130.29a066a1@r500.local> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.90]); Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:51:21 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in! X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:51:24 -0000 On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Fabian Keil wrote: >> >> When you add the tuning back, does it take minutes again to boot? If >> not, I assume it was cleaning up some leftovers the old version was not >> able to cleanup. > > I haven't tried that yet, but as I didn't upgrade the system's > storage pool I don't think ZFS is supposed to do any such clean-ups. The new code likely does things like search for and reclaim leaked space. Older zfs versions had some some bugs which could result in failing to reclaim space after a large file is deleted. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/