Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:48:22 +0200
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6vesd=E1n?= <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
To:        RJ45 <rj45@slacknet.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FFS or reiserfs ?
Message-ID:  <44CBAD76.9050503@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0607291231130.29069@slacknet.com>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.61.0607291231130.29069@slacknet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RJ45 wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I do not know if it is better to use reiserfs or the standard rReeBSD
> filesystem with soft updates enabled for a cyrus spool and db partition.
> Users have a lot of files on those partition.
> Anyone can suggest me if it is better to use reiserfs or FFS ?
> I am using FreeBSD 6.1
>
> thanks
>
> Rick
>
>
Reiserfs is read only, so you can only use FFS yet.

-- 
Cheers,

Gabor




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44CBAD76.9050503>