From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Feb  3 12:59:13 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA21445
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 12:59:13 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from dashells.net ([209.54.66.120])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA21437;
          Wed, 3 Feb 1999 12:59:11 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hideaway@dashells.net)
Received: from localhost (hideaway@localhost)
	by dashells.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA00878;
	Wed, 3 Feb 1999 16:00:43 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 16:00:43 -0500 (EST)
From: Pete <hideaway@dashells.net>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
cc: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@FreeBSD.ORG>,
        woodford@cc181716-a.hwrd1.md.home.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: tcpdump 
In-Reply-To: <9575.918011566@zippy.cdrom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902031600270.874-100000@dashells.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Yes 

I mean, why the hell not? heh


On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:

>OK, time to raise this topic again.  What to people think about
>enabling bpfilter by default in GENERIC?
>
>And before everyone screams "That would not be BSD!" let me just
>note that NetBSD and probably OpenBSD (haven't looked) already do
>this.
>
>- Jordan
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message