Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:13:41 -0500
From:      "Simon Chang" <simonychang@gmail.com>
To:        "Martin McCormick" <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: vmware Questions
Message-ID:  <8efc42630702220713w4bf0590fm112788415c1c8cab@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200702221229.l1MCTpu5035467@dc.cis.okstate.edu>
References:  <200702221229.l1MCTpu5035467@dc.cis.okstate.edu>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
A rule of thumb is to configure as much service as you need (in this
case, dhcpd), with as little overhead as you can get away with (a
simple jail vs. a full-blown VM).

SC

On 2/22/07, Martin McCormick <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu> wrote:
> John Nielsen, referring to running multiple DHCPD's,  writes:
> > For what you're talking about, jails make a lot more sense than
> > virtualization or emulation.
>
>        Thank you!  That is exactly the kind of input I was
> looking for.  As soon as I read yours and Frank Staals' mention
> of jails, it clicked.  A true jail will have a little version of
> as much of the FreeBSD world as dhcpd needs to run.  This should
> be much easier on resources and more predictable as to results.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8efc42630702220713w4bf0590fm112788415c1c8cab>