From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 22 15:41:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E627B16A401 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:41:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simonychang@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C7B13C494 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:41:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simonychang@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so205986nzh for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:41:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rK9fOrI8sGS4wmdC9jh9F3p/kpk8iX4YFhJq0kup0TpRQNrLUb0vRU5G+K+/3E1P/bGQGWrRcqYgJzkoN+iAA8PLUlJNDxXxLyfTOxYlIFfXbuokTTfsAfkBmvlUS+dm3VZEwZO9JWG0xID79+7RfcBnXrtphW7uQrYihdMkQxg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pb+E4hAxY3gnuQLixwaNag95C37atKQZBUfM+zAMfZOIhU0z2pjOw8SoqxOwsvuq3/dM3AXLtgXPzCrRW405SBnIin91GRlP4rAgFzeHQOK4ObTGvGN9w0DQWpcDtY2zEhLa8X6Cij2BzALX/+SeHS9SN1w9FbiChSMx+5oR0SI= Received: by 10.64.180.20 with SMTP id c20mr1315847qbf.1172157221350; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:13:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.148.18 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:13:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8efc42630702220713w4bf0590fm112788415c1c8cab@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:13:41 -0500 From: "Simon Chang" To: "Martin McCormick" In-Reply-To: <200702221229.l1MCTpu5035467@dc.cis.okstate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200702221229.l1MCTpu5035467@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:41:23 -0000 A rule of thumb is to configure as much service as you need (in this case, dhcpd), with as little overhead as you can get away with (a simple jail vs. a full-blown VM). SC On 2/22/07, Martin McCormick wrote: > John Nielsen, referring to running multiple DHCPD's, writes: > > For what you're talking about, jails make a lot more sense than > > virtualization or emulation. > > Thank you! That is exactly the kind of input I was > looking for. As soon as I read yours and Frank Staals' mention > of jails, it clicked. A true jail will have a little version of > as much of the FreeBSD world as dhcpd needs to run. This should > be much easier on resources and more predictable as to results. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >