Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 20:54:02 -0500 (CDT) From: Anthony Kimball <alk@pobox.com> To: cjclark@home.com Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups Message-ID: <14317.30075.780224.678708@avalon.east> References: <19990925151703.A74168@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> <199909251825.OAA39003@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoth Crist J. Clark on Sat, 25 September: : How are : the arguments different between blocking a dynamic, dial-in IP : addresses, versus blocking ones that do not reverse-lookup[1]? Not much, practically. : In : either case, there is no a priori reason to assume that any mail from : the address is SPAM, yet no one seems to think that a blanket rule to : block such machines is unfair. I sure do! And foolish. Sure, antagonize the majority of the users of the network. Inviting legislation is what that is. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14317.30075.780224.678708>