Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:52:08 +0300
From:      Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>
To:        Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Artyom Viklenko <artem@aws-net.org.ua>, ticso@cicely.de
Subject:   Re: Juniper e3k with ports limitied to 100Mbit and re NICs on MSI MoBo: problems with duplex negotiation (Hetzner host provider discard FreeBSD support due this bug)
Message-ID:  <165642603.20110112115208@serebryakov.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20110111220314.GZ39356@cicely7.cicely.de>
References:  <1512738982.20110111124729@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110111163825.GF7511@numachi.com> <76226157.20110111222913@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4D2CB1F5.6080106@aws-net.org.ua> <98602823.20110111225049@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110111220314.GZ39356@cicely7.cicely.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Bernd.
You wrote 12 =FF=ED=E2=E0=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 1:03:14:


> I'm not surprised that it doesn't work with autonegotian if autonegotian
> is disabled.
> If Linux does full-duplex without autonegotiation then _they_ do it wrong
> and Hetzner shouldn't rely on wrong behavour.
  As far as I understand, Linux does full-duplex without
autonegotiation because it is say to do full-duplex (like FreeBSD's
"ifconfig re0 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex"). Is it violation
of standard too -- manual configuration of FD?

> However since you seem to have access it might be interesting to know the
> exact network device and debug why hard setting is broken.
   As far as I understand, again, it is not broken, but disabled,
 because cause problems on some devices...



--=20
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?165642603.20110112115208>