Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 18:32:07 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@citusc.usc.edu> To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Carlos A M dos Santos <casantos@cpmet.ufpel.tche.br>, kris@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG, taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp Subject: Re: Making XFree86-4 the default Message-ID: <20001026183207.A71629@citusc17.usc.edu> In-Reply-To: <vqcvgugkkee.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 02:43:21AM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010241252140.377-100000@gate.cpmet.ufpel.tche.br> <vqcvgugkkee.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 02:43:21AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > Are there any other outstanding issues re throwing the big switch and > making XFree86-4 the default now? (As it says in the subject > line...you guys thought I replied to an old mail by mistake? :) Does the PAM stuff actually work? I thought I heard someone say that it doesnt actually do anything. Do we depend on the xwrapper by default yet, and not install the servers setuid root? Those are the outstanding things on my list. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001026183207.A71629>