From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 10 01:40:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81BC16A403 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:40:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FC713C441 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:40:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1A1eBaV045022 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:40:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l1A1eB2n045021; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:40:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:40:11 GMT Message-Id: <200702100140.l1A1eB2n045021@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Tom Rhodes Cc: Subject: Re: docs/108980: list of missing man pages X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tom Rhodes List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:40:11 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/108980; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Rhodes To: Yonatan Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, yonatan@afarsec.com Subject: Re: docs/108980: list of missing man pages Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:21:47 -0500 On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:39:41 +0200 (IST) Yonatan wrote: > > >Number: 108980 > >Category: docs > >Synopsis: list of missing man pages [SNIP]: PR discussion, tool, and manual page list. I'm in favor of reviewing this with everyone else; however, I would like to run it on a "fresh" install of FreeBSD. One with no ports or special build options. Also, there was once a way to handle ports manual pages; or at least a discussion of it. I see many references to such things as zip and zsh, utilities that should not be referenced unless we somehow reference the port. Perhaps we should de-reference those pages, and add a paragraph stating that use of XXX/XXX utility might be useful. Not sure, what do others think? -- Tom Rhodes