Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:56:07 -0700 From: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Giulio Ferro <auryn@zirakzigil.org>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Issue with igb and lagg (was Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd) Message-ID: <CAFOYbcm6fv5Y8LkN_QgUoDmSk1pcQoc=yq1S7wgR4x4QW8WwSQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ47wES2RdkuftP7FGJqwDFN=t6z%2Bjbh6zSeuLJGJas81w@mail.gmail.com> References: <5033FB17.7020600@zirakzigil.org> <503884A0.50708@zirakzigil.org> <FF06542A-9507-4C8C-99EC-8275B04D4CF1@my.gd> <E183609A-19E1-4EF4-B08D-FAA55779E193@my.gd> <503BC8F5.3040208@zirakzigil.org> <CAE63ME6oi_5Yam5wXuJzYBhhv%2BN6MnQPOXReXo2Ugo1hjvv25Q@mail.gmail.com> <503E7A16.6030600@zirakzigil.org> <5044F62E.8030001@zirakzigil.org> <CAPyG9gMaNnLJOE00bH66qpAoJfdU=YtpUvz24fj%2B1nyvjDDCAg@mail.gmail.com> <504FA735.709@zirakzigil.org> <CAOjFWZ4kr3sVmymCgh5Fchhm2QR42GAquwHhdgA=MBLY4U-xhA@mail.gmail.com> <5050E107.6090403@zirakzigil.org> <CAOjFWZ682YTzN-PQwujdm=kVvyQpJzNb7wtbVNZnMcjOn_gFeg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFOYbcmXv7d7=mfafR3JsEkwgSN1dZtmvqmp1p2PXyV27oH9GQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ47wES2RdkuftP7FGJqwDFN=t6z%2Bjbh6zSeuLJGJas81w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks for checking. I've used lagg(4) with igb, just not on 9.x. > >> > >> You're right, it seems to be pointing to the igb(4) driver in 9.x > >> compared to < 9.0. > >> > > How do you determine that since it doesn't happen without lagg? I've no > > reports of igb hanging otherwise and its being used extensively. > > Well, I did say "seems to". :) > > igb+lagg worked for us on 8.3. Haven't tried it since moving to 9.0 > and 9-STABLE on those three boxes. > > igb+lagg doesn't work for him on 9.0. Although, I don't recall if > non-LACP options were tried earlier in this thread, or if it's just > the LACP mode that's failing. If one mode works (say failover) and > LACP mode doesn't, that "seems to" point to lagg. > > I'll see if I can free up an igb port on my 9.0 and 9-STABLE boxes to > test this with as well. > > I wouldn't use 9.0, go with 9.1 RC or whatever has the latest igb code, if you see the issue there I can see about getting some time to look into it here. Jack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFOYbcm6fv5Y8LkN_QgUoDmSk1pcQoc=yq1S7wgR4x4QW8WwSQ>