From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 21:09:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E56E1065672; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vermaden@interia.pl) Received: from smtp239.poczta.interia.pl (smtp239.poczta.interia.pl [217.74.64.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32C58FC08; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:09:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vermaden@interia.pl) Received: by smtp239.poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL, from userid 502) id 445DB3971E3; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:09:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from f46.poczta.interia.pl (f46.poczta.interia.pl [10.217.2.46]) by smtp239.poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL) with ESMTP id 9E9E7396FD9; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:09:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by f46.poczta.interia.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4CF46CCF0; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:09:25 +0100 (CET) Date: 09 Nov 2008 22:09:25 +0100 From: vermaden To: Boris Kochergin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-2 X-ORIGINATE-IP: 85.89.167.26 X-Mailer: PSE Message-Id: <20081109210925.ED4CF46CCF0@f46.poczta.interia.pl> X-EMID: 74540acc Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysctl debug.cpufreq.highest X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 21:09:29 -0000 Thank You mate. Works like a charm, why not merge it into STABLE and CURRENT branches? I assume that STABLE is currently frozen 'cause of the RELEASE process, but such a small (and tested as 'lowest') change should fit into RELEASE. Regards vermaden > I've rolled a patchset to do this for 7.0-RELEASE > (http://acm.poly.edu/~spawk/cpufreq/) if anyone's interested. > > -Boris > > vermaden wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Currently there is possibility to set lowest speed of > > cpu for scaling with cpufreq (debug.cpufreq.lowest), > > it would be good to include also a option to set the > > highest possible freq to use with cpufreq, some laptops > > get too hot and/or consume too much power when running > > on maximum power/speed of cpu. > > > > Regards > > vermaden ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Dzwon taniej na zagraniczne komorki! Sprawdz >> http://link.interia.pl/f1f6a